bagsorshoes's blog: "bagsorshoes"

Obama government in the policy of "uncertainty" has been to blame for enterprise investment and economic growth in the United States are the standstill reason.
And about Japan double VAT (increased from 5% to 10%) proposal whether can pass the problem to Japanese enterprise decision and economic growth is likely to impact is not big. The proposal is Japan wild tian jia told the government after the year-long debate eventually after last month's successful submission.
Looking to the future, in the psychological and practice of Japanese economic and political seems very likely generate more chilling effect, is the diaoyu island between the territorial dispute caused by constantly upgrade the uncertainty. Japan's decision by the government from the so-called Japanese private land owner bought the diaoyu islands to implement "nationalization", the decision at present looks like is irrevocable. China has made it clear that Japan will therefore give pay a heavy price, its degree will be far more than the Japanese government given only the purchase price.
As The Australian national university strategy research study professor Hugh odd Wright (Hugh White) in its latest issue of The important book "China's Choice: Why The United States Should Share Power" (The China Choice - Why America Should Share Power) described in east Asian crisis situation hypothesis that, like The diaoyu islands such territorial disputes will be very easy to (or even inevitable) upgraded to armed conflict. In such territorial disputes, the parties for fear that our appear weak or indecision, so in ongoing defiance of and response, had to turn to the other party on the same level, and even more pressure and threats, and will never shrink back. These also to "Allies" cause great risk (the United States is Japan's Allies), "Allies" previous to support a party even be drawn into the conflict of commitment can't were violated, lest shows that the alliance doesn't work and make no sense.
From it we can see clearly that the United States has long been involved in a territorial dispute in the. From the point of view of China, the United States is still diaoyu island territory dispute part of the problem, and not the solution to the (or improve) part of the way. In professor white the above works clearly describe the situation, we can expect China to the United States will continue to put heavy pressure, and it will only aggravate the United States had to choose between the two countries the dilemma.
In Russia at the weekend held Vladivostok asia-pacific economic cooperation summit, as it diaoyu islands territorial sovereignty problem of a dispute between the two countries together representatives to attend the meeting, that kind of coldness and hostile feeling is like Russia tundra hard soil to be heavy. This summit for many participating countries to provide a display and other participating countries delegation bilateral relations between friendly "photos action" opportunities both leaders committed to strengthening cooperation and trade. And between the two countries in between, and there was no such bilateral talks.
Finally, on September 9, at the end of the summit in apparently in order to avoid the two countries seem diplomatic relations between broken down completely and in crisis, the two nations arranged two leaders in the conference hall 15 minutes of a "informal" to meet. China's leaders like to take this opportunity to rudely warning Japan in the diaoyu island question do not make the wrong decision, and said that Japanese take any way "purchase island" is illegal and invalid.
China's official media Monday in front page news way published China to Japan's warnings. (strange is, Japan and not be similar reports) now China is no longer a euphemism preaching, this means that if Japan pushiness of words, so the diaoyu islands nationalization action will not tolerate for China. China says, Japan this will seriously and lasting damage to relations between the two countries, in the economic, commercial and political two countries many relationship causes a series of inevitable and serious consequences. In other words, China will take massive retaliation action. Will be what kind of revenge action? Japanese interests will suffer a serious, how the lasting influence? (Japanese carmakers will become a Chinese revenge target) at present these are unknown problems.
Therefore, we returned to in Japan enterprise investment and economic growth problems cast a shadow on the uncertainty, in view of the diaoyu islands territorial dispute problem without apparent end or a good tongue, this kind of uncertainty becomes more was wrong.