FOR THOSE OF U THAT WATCH WRESTLING I'M SURE YOUR
AWARE OF THE UNDERTAKER GETTING STRIPPED OF THE
BELT ON SMACKDOWN NOW I HAVE SAID FOR THE LONGEST
TIME WWE NEEDS TO STOP PUSHING UNDERTAKER AND
DEVELOP YOUNGER STARS BUT THIS ANGLE MAKES NO
SENSE WHATSOEVER!! FIRST LET ME SAY I DON'T
BELEIVE IN STRIPPING A CHAMPION OF IT'S TITLE
UNLESS HE IS HURT AND REALLY CAN'T GET IN THE RING
AND JOB THE BELT IT CHEAPENS THE BELT WHEN THE
CHAMPION DOESN'T LOSE IN THE RING BUT WHAT IRKS ME
THE MOST IS THEY STRIPPED TAKER THEN DECIDED TO
HAVE A TOURNAMENT WITH EACH WINNER ADVANCING TO A
BATTLE ROYAL TO FACE THE UNDERTAKER FOR THE BELT
AT JUDGEMENT DAY NOW Y DOES THE UNDERTAKER WHO WAS
STRIPPED OF THE BELT STILL WRESTLE FOR THE WORLD
BELT DOES THAT MAKE SENSE??TO ME THEY WERE BETTER
OFF KEEPING THE BELT ON TAKER AND HAVING HIM DEFEND IT AGAINST EDGE INSTEAD OF THIS LAME ANGLE
WERE HE GETS STRIPPED BUT SOMEHOW STILL WRESTLES
THE WINNER OF THE BATTLE ROYAL (EDGE) FOR THE BELT THAT HE WAS STRIPPED OF NOW I KNOW WRESTLING
IS FAKE AND IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO ALWAYS MAKE SENSE
BUT COME ON LET'S ATLEAST MAKE IT SOMEWHAT BELEIVEABLE AND HAVE COMPELLING TELEVISION THIS IS
ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF Y THE WWE IS LOSING RATINGS AND
NOT SELLING OUT THEIR SHOWS IT JUST MAKES NO SENSE
TO STRIP HIM OFF THE BELT AND STILL PUT HIM IN THE MAIN EVENT TO WRESTLE FOR THE BELT THEY SHOULD
HAVE JUST KEPT THE BELT ON HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE
ATLEAST THE INTEGRITY OF THE WWE TITLE WOULD HAVE
BEEN SOMEWHAT INTACT NOW IT'S GONNA TAKE MONTHS
TO REEASTABLISH ANY CREDEBILITY TO THE WORLD TITLE
MAN I SHOULD BE WRITING FOR A SPORTS MAGAZINE LOL ANYWAY FEEL FREE TO COMMENT ON THIS ONE WAY OR THE OTHER
