Greetings and salutations
This is a first for me. Basicaly my first blog. I never saw any use for blogging. To me it seemed worthless. Then I started reading some. You can get quite an insight on the person you are reading. This could be either positive or negative.For instance, a person to whom I have been friends with for quite some time on line, blogged. After reading several of their blogs, I came to the realisation, this is not a person I want to be friends with. I won't go into the details, let's just say I avoid this person at all costs. Haveing this experience in hand, and, knowing that every course of action has its reprocussions, good or bad, and that I may loose some friend's, I may also gain some. Haveing said this I will take this time to appologise to those I might offend. However, this is part of who I am. I am who I am, and, if you can't accept that I don't need you as a friend anyway.
The decission to do this comes from years of conversation, debate and philosophical discussions. Though I don't consider myself a philosophicsl person. Over the years I have been told I should publish some of my "insights". "Share these insights, idea's and, ponderings" they say. Shyeah!! Like any one in their right mind would spend their good money on the rantings and raveings of a curmudgeon. A disscussion the other day on line, ended the same way. The resolve was to blog it and get some input on it. This I may do at a later date.
Also I would like to go on record at this time in makeing a request of all of you. Please don't turn into an english professor and try to gramatically correct me, correct my spelling or puncuation. A person who does this, is an annoyance to me. I'm not a pretty person when annoyed.
WARNING: I have a tendancy to use graphic language. Here to, if this offends you, don't read me. This is part of who I am.
I am open to critisism and comments, just don't be an annoyance. However, be prepared to have a lengthy conversation if either of the afore mentioned are deemed worthy of debate or correlative sentiment.
Now comes the next subject. What to scrutinize first? Politics? Naw, I hate polocktics. Nothing but a bunch of lieing, two faced, hypocrates. The only thing on their minds is their own agenda's, and, self gratifying intentions, rather than the common wellfare of the common collective.
Religion? We won't go there too much. Don't ask.
We could contemplate the meaning of life vis-a-vis consequential/deontological theories, apodictic transformation schemata. The incoherence of eyemplification, metophysical realism, Cartesian interactive dualism. Revised nonreactive dualism, postmodernist grammatology and dicy dichotomies. But all we would be lft with is a bunch of people scratching their asses and picking their noses wondering what the hell I just said (formost includes myself for i have no fucking idea what i said).
so I will contemplate this delema and get back with you later.
