Ahimsa Bodhi's blog: "AnarchoTalk"

If you're an Anarchist that will only engage with other Anarchists, you're conspicuously doing a disservice to your own cause. I cerebrate you should engage with people with divergent views, even ones of a hazardous kind, like racism and antisemitism. I'm an anarchist and I'm endeavoring to work, and get everybody else to work, towards an anarchist society. It can sound off-putting, I conjecture, when I commence verbalizing about how we don't require a regime or a military, or borders or police. I can explicate why with each subject piecemeal. But right now I just want to talk about engaging with people that don't apportion your opinion, because you'll get nowhere and nothing will get done, you're just saying the same thing back and forth with no one to challenge you. That's not doing any good. I don't optate everybody to cerebrate the same way, but I do optate you to recognize fucked up when you see it, and having a regime tell you what you can and cannot do, is fucked up, and it's not liberation. No country is free, not America either. The definition of liberation is "the potency or right to act, say, or think as one wants without obstruction or restraint" and we do not retain that. Only under Anarchism can that be procured.
Authentically, I'll give you a taste of what transpires when police are nowhere to be seen.
The Violence that would occur without regime, couldn't hold a candle to the violence by the regime. There are many anarchist cities and towns, they have no police force, yet they're largely peaceful. When New York police officers ephemerally minimized their “proactive policing” efforts on low-level offenses, major-crime reports in the city genuinely fell. When a youtuber spent a whole day and night in a town without police, nothing deplorable transpired, but a peaceful neighborhood festival.