Brian Mora N B S D's blog: "TRUTHTAP"

Welcome to my new blog here on CherryTap, TruthTap, which is designed to give a rather thorough and unique view of the events of the world we live in and life in general. In this first edition we shall explore some of the issues that may not be making the news and even some that are... UNNECESSARY MESSING WITH THE SIGN FONTS...AND YOU'RE PAYING FOR IT In some states you have started seeing a strange new font appear on some of your highway signs. You may hvae noticed that a number of the letters and numbers don't look quite the way they used to. The reason: The federal government have started publishing standards for how to implement this new font, called "Clearview". And you are paying for this rather radical adjustment to your signage. It is already becoming more commonplace throughout Arkansas, Texas, and Pennsylvania. But just because PennDot, ADOT, and TxDot like it, is it really necessary? The study says yes...and the idea is that instead of using standard FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) fonts which come in series A through F with a super boldfaced E Modified font, the latter of which has become de rigueur in Oklahoma and to a lesser extent Missouri, but which has become standard for most state route markers in Oklahoma, with the exception of the new Oklahoma state markers. The new Oklahoma markers debuted in January with an outline of the state near the top of the frame and the usually D-series FHWA font numbers near the bottom, with some three-digit numbers getting C-series and a few B-series. But back to the Clearview/FHWA Standards: I really don't see the need for a new font if the enhanced visibility is only a small fraction (11 to 15 percent) or even if the font uses a smaller footprint in some cases than the FHWA counterpart. And besides, if the conditions are heavily fogged, or if you are experiencing reduced vision, it doesn't matter what you use on your signs, you are going to have greater difficulty reading the signs. The FHWA's, TxDot's, and Penndot's own studies show that there is not that much improvement in the visibility in Clearview Series 5WR over FHWA Standard Series D or E, though Series E---that is the font you most commonly see on most highway signs in the United States, Spain, Holland, South Africa (which are using more Normschrift, the font series common to road signs in Germany), Australia (though the state of Victoria, which have begun implementing UK-style letter-number combination route designations, like M1, A2, and B3, are also using Transport, which is common to UK roads and to some extent Pennsylvania), New Zealand, and most provincial highways in Canada. This may be a sign for you to take better care of your eyes in the first place, see an ophthamologist as necessary, I have, and used to use reading glasses for a while in my teens, and later wore prescription sunglasses, and definitely DO NOT forget to take Vitamin A or at the least eat Vitamin A-enriched foods like carrots. Also to note that states need to start making larger signs with much larger fonts, which is the experience in Oklahoma and Missouri. Modot are now using larger and bolder fonts with slightly smaller route markers which may well be a disadvantage on that part if you are trying to figure out what route you are about to take especially in dark and/or inclement conditions. As for ODOT, you can see clearly that their experience is to use bolder fonts and sometimes larger route markers, at least in Tulsa you will see wider route markers for Interstate 244 with bolder numbers. It is not uncommon to see US Highway Route markers still bearing the bolder numbers although most US highway signs bear D Series. (LEFT/TOP) New Oklahoma state route markers which debuted in January 2006 (LEFT/CENTRE) Old Oklahoma state route markers used since the 1960s, was a recommended FHWA standard design (LEFT/BOTTOM) Old Oklahoma route markers from the 1990s and 2000s with FHWA Series E Modified numerals (RIGHT) Freeway sign from Interstate 244 and US412 (Martin Luther King Memorial Expressway) in central Tulsa. Note the I-244 marker's E Modified numbers. (TOP LEFT) Current FHWA standards; (TOP RIGHT) Clearview proposal; (BOTTOM) My solution Maybe I should offer my own solution to the problem: Fill the whole sign, larger markers as with Oklahoma, larger fonts as with Missouri, but even bigger still, FILL THE SIGN with text and route markers, as much as 25 percent larger markers and 25 to 35 percent larger fonts, that way there can be no doubt about the legibility of the signs. And we won't need another series of fonts to mess with either. ============== LET'S HELP SAVE KEITON KNIGHT NOW! But who is Keiton Knight? FROM KEITONKNIGHT.CO.UK : Keiton is 7 years old and has been suffering from cancer for nearly 4 years now, he relapsed in the last month of treatment in July this year with a different type of cancer which left specialists baffled, as it is very rare for this to happen. After an exhausting search for a suitable bone marrow match, surgeons have recently informed Keiton’s family that Keiton’s bone marrow type is so rare that a match may never be found, they were also told that due to the aggressions of Keiton's cancer they don’t think he will live past 6 months without some type of stem cell treatment! The best option is for Keiton to have cord blood transplant (stem cells from the umbilical cord of a new born baby) which doesn't require the extremely close tissue-type matching, which is why one has now been found for Keiton. BUT the UK hasn’t performed this type of transplant too often, and it is now apparent that to give Keiton the best chance of survival he needs to go to the USA where they specialise in this. This life saving procedure alone costs $600 000 and Keiton and his mother Paris must spend two months in Duke Hospital, Durham NC USA which is one of the most experienced centers for this procedure in the world. On top of this, Keiton and Paris must spend a minimum of 6-8 months living close to the hospital whilst receiving outpatient care. There are several possibilities for this, depending on funding. =========== GEORGE SOROS: A CRIMINAL THREAT TO AMERICAN LIBERTY?

Much attention has been paid to Hungarian-born immigrant George Soros who has made his billions on the backs of foreign currencies. He tried to break the British pound sterling and the Malaysian ringgit, then had to deal with French authorities regarding suspect investments.
And now he has squarely targeted the American government.
Soros has dumped millions upon millions of his money into fringe leftist organisations like MoveOn.org and other Communist front groups in effort to hijack democracy as we know it and steal Congress from the people, even dumping millions into the media for falsehood-riddled and defamatory advertisements, openly attacking a sitting wartime president. He has even tried to infiltrate a conservative political action committee.
And this pattern continues even after he poured millions into an effort to hijack the George Walker Bush presidency but as we all know more than enough Americans stood up to Soros and the likes of MoveOn.org---a neocommunist front group established by supporters of the media-selected phony president Bill Clinton when they did not like the truth being told about Clinton's myriad scandals including his lying to a grand jury---and yet both Soros and MoveOn.org are cursed with one thing in common: their irrational partisan hatred.
They are consumed with a reckless and vengeful intolerance of anyone who disagrees with their closedminded viewpoint, their flawed drumbeat of hate the President, hate Congress, hate George W Bush, hate Dick Cheney, hate Condoleezza Rice, hate, hate, hate.
They also play the blame game, blame the President, blame Congress, blame George W Bush, blame Dick Cheney, blame Condoleezza Rice, blame, blame, blame, blame them for Iraq, blame them for Afghanistan, blame them for the terrorist attacks of 11 September, blame, blame, blame, especially when many of their own principals:
* APPEASED those who CAUSED the acts of 11 September by failing to address the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing AND the Nairobi and Daressalaam embassy bombings in 1998 AND the USS Cole bombing in 2000 (1)
* Worked with a president who HAD HIS CHANCE to pop Osama BinLaden and behead AlQaeda before they could gain the power that they have gained (2) and BLEW THAT CHANCE whilst engaged in sexual play with an intern (3)
* DISMANTLED the military by consistently cutting the budget time after time, to the point where military aircraft were SCAVENGED FOR PARTS (4)
* ABUSED the military to cover up presidential scandals at home to no avail (5) putting them under international dictates (6) and even destroyed the good name of Michael New when he refused to wear the blue UN helmets (7)
* AIDED AND ABETTED illegal aliens in the United States (8)
* AIDED AND ABETTED convicted felons (9)
* AIDED AND ABETTED election fraud (10)
* AIDED AND ABETTED illegal aliens invading Serbia from Albania (11)
* ATTACKED the sovereignty of the United States (12)
* ATTACKED the sovereignty of the republic of Serbia for innocently defending themselves from terrorist invaders (13) * APPEASED the flooding of Red Chinese products into the American marketplace by overlooking their human rights violations for the sake of cheaper products (13) further damaging the American manufacturing industries (14) and showing blatant hypocrisy toward their union backers by favouring cheap goods from and slave labour in Red China over quality-made American goods built by union labour in the United States (15)
* ATTACKED the freedoms of gun owners' rights (16)
* ATTACKED the freedoms of unborn rights supporters (17)
* Tried FORCING socialised medicine upon an unwilling American populace which openly protested their national "Hillarycare" tour (18)
* And even tried to attack the success of talk radio hosts critical of the Clinton anointistration by proposing the reimposition of the so-called Fairness Doctrine in 1993 (19)
* APPEASED North Korean dictators Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il by giving them two-way talks that led to them getting oil for their country in supposed exchange for shutting down their nuclear power plant (20)...but as we all know, Clinton let Il off the hook and didn't hold him to account, now they have nuclear weapons.
* And all have been glorified by the controlled media with their similar partisan tendencies (21)
So I don't see where their principals have anything to stand on. These people reacted with rage in 1994 when we the people decided that for the first time in 40 years we really truly were going to have a Congress by the people for the people of the people not the media. The result was the Republican revolution and many new measures were passed, though the President did veto many of those, but he had to be dragged kicking and screaming to approve welfare reform then claimed all the credit.
Most recently that same faux President erupted at Fox News' Chris Wallace in an interview, falsely claiming he had a plan to catch BinLaden. We all know that he didn't even try.
Just showing you all of that so you can see the background of the supporters of Former President Bill Clinton.
And that is the sort of background that fuels the contempt that Soros and MoveOn.org have for President George W Bush and for the Republican Congress.
Truth is they also have contempt for the majority of Americans who WANT secure borders, who WANT to protect their freedom, who WANT to finish the job in Afghanistan and Iraq.
And let's look into Soros' background even more:
Soros has funded campaigns to decriminalise doctor-assisted homicide and dangerous drugs like cannabis.
He has also heavily funded Democrat campaigns as far back as 2000.
He has singlehandedly collapsed the Thai economy. (That article link ALSO contains more information about his movements that helped stifle privatisation in Russia and fuel the rise of antisocial socialism. They even conveniently and falsely and grossly underreported the numbers of Nato-killed Serbians.)
He has employed methods similar to those used by Enron executives.
He has established "Democracy Collaborative", another neosocialist group that sponsored John Kerry in his failed run for the presidency.
He spent more than $80.000 on one of his organisations dedicated to defeating laws criminalising drugs in effort to unseat a county prosecutor in New York state in the 2004 Democratic primary...in a method that violated state and federal campagin laws.
He then pushed MORE money into Fenton Communications---a leftist PR firm that claims MoveOn.org as a top client---which then pushed a greater bid focusing on an irrational anti-American, anti-war message. (And helped push the campaigns of Wesley Clark AND Howard Dean for the DNC nomination.)
He also accused US House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-IL, of a "smear campaign" when Hastert confronted Soros on the source of his $7bn fortune.
And a grieving parent who tried to warn the National Press Club at a 2004 press conference of the threat that George Soros poses to American freedom liberty sovereignty and democracy with his drugs legalisation plans was brutally assaulted by hired criminal thugs who dislocated Steve Steiner's shoulder. Mr Steiner is the founder of Dads And Mad Moms Against Drug Dealers (DAMMADD)...and paid to attend a conference where draconian security personnel dictated that if one person at a table dared dissent everyone would be dumped out.
He led a workshop an April 2005 workshop in Arizona featuring 70 wealthy individuals on how to push his brand of Marxism, a meeting convened by a former Clinton Commerce Department official, and on which Democrat party officials were kept informed.
And he gave more than $24m of his money to organisations like MoveOn.org in the 2004 election cycle alone in effort to steal the White House and the Congress from the American people.

But of course the controlled media are hellbent on ignoring his evildoing in favour of mongering fake scandals against the majority Republican leadership and thus the Republican majority in this country are further threatened as George Soros seeks to encourage government by the media for the media of the media not the people...and you know it needs to be the other way around.
The media conveniently defame the upstanding character of Halliburton whilst ignoring a real threat to our freedom from George Soros whose personal wealth is more than half that of the needlessly maligned company.
And whilst Republicans raised large amounts of money on their own, and through a wider variety of donors---George Soros was cited as having donated to the left-leaning Media Fund and MoveOn.org, thus furthering his reputation for having bought MoveOn.org and a number of left-wing organisations. It has even gone to the point where MoveOn.org have now claimed they own the Democrat party...with pride!
He also bankrolled Ned Lamont's theft of Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman's party nomination in the Democratic primary in that state Since then Senator Lieberman has received a major boost from REPUBLICANS...including even those in the WHITE HOUSE...who have sacrificed their own party candidate in that race, a man named Schlesinger, for the sake of keeping the treasonous fringe out of power, particularly in a state where independents outnumber both Democrats and Republicans.

And George Soros is indeed responsible for hijacking a major political party.

Someone needs to tell George Soros that we the people have taken back our power to choose our leadership. We the people will never tolerate those who seek to steal power from us by thinking they can "buy" their way into power.
And George Soros has clearly shown us how much contempt he has for the American people as a whole as well as our government and our way of life. Why didn't he simply move back to Hungary and try to improve the way that those people live instead?! What is he doing here in America if he doesn't like it so much?
O, I see. He is trying to steal power from us so he can impose his neocommunist hegemony upon the masses. This is where we absolutely positively MUST wake the hell up and see the light. This is where we need to see how much of a threat George Soros is to our freedom. This is where we MUST see where the REAL culture of corruption and criminality reside: well within the Democratic party and the neocommunist neosocialist neoliberal fringe minority movements, both of which are heavily funded by George Soros.
It is now way past time to start investigating George Soros. You read this right: We need a US Attorney or the Attorney General to indict Soros---already convicted in France of insider trading---for his fraudulent dealings in American politics.

Where We Can Stick Soros

We can bust George Soros under the following laws:

Federal Election Code, Section 437g, Subsection (A)(12)(d)(1)(A)(i) Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any provision of this Act which involves the making, receiving, or reporting of any contribution, donation or expenditure—
(i) aggregating $25000 or more during a calendar year shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both
On which we have MULTIPLE charges involved in just the 2006 campaigns alone let alone the 2004 and 2002 campaigns.

Federal Election Code, Section 437g, Subsection (A)(12)(d)(1)(B)
(B) In the case of a knowing and willful violation of section 441b(b)(3) of this title, the penalties set forth in this subsection shall apply to a violation involving an amount aggregating $250 or more during a calendar year. Such violation of section 441b(b)(3) of this title may incorporate a violation of section 441c(b), 441f, and 441g of this title.

The law goes yet even further. Check out the following further penalties:

(C) In the case of a knowing and willful violation of section 441h of this title, the penalties set forth in this subsection shall apply without regard to whether the making, receiving, or reporting of a contribution or expenditure of $1,000 or more is involved.
(D) Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of section 320 (2 U.S.C. § 441f) involving an amount aggregating more than $10000 during a calendar year shall be—
(i) imprisoned for not more than 2 years if the amount is less than $25.000 (and subject to imprisonment under subparagraph (A) if the amount is $25000 or more);
(ii) fined not less than 300 percent of the amount involved in the violation and not more than the greater of—
(I) $50000; or
(II) 1000 percent of the amount involved in the violation; or
(iii) both imprisoned under clause (i) and fined under clause (ii)

Of course Soros could indeed claim ignorance and try to get a lesser sentence and fine, but it is doubtful that he will get that sort of outcome; he is on his way to prison and getting some of his wealth liquidated, maybe even deported back to Hungary where he came from. Check this out anyway:

Federal Election Code, Section 437g, Subsection (A)(12)(d)(2)
In any criminal action brought for a violation of any provision of this Act or of chapter 95 or chapter 96 of this title 26, any defendant may evidence their lack of knowledge or in tent to commit the alleged violation by introducing as evidence a conciliation agreement entered into between the defendant and the Commission under subsection (a)(4)(A) of this section which specifically deals with the act or failure to act constituting such violation and which is still in effect. Federal Election Code, Section 441a (a) Dollar limits on contributions.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (i) and section 315A (2 U.S.C. § 441a-1), no person shall make contributions*—
(A) to any candidate and his authorized political committees with respect to any election for Federal office which, in the aggregate, exceed $2000;
(B) to the political committees established and maintained by a national political party, which are not the authorized political committees of any candidate, in any calendar year which, in the aggregate, exceed $25000;
(C) to any other political committee (other than a committee described in subparagraph (D)) in any calendar year which, in the aggregate, exceed $5000; or
(D) to a political committee established and maintained by a State committee of a political party in any calendar year which, in the aggregate, exceed $10000.

_{*Sections 102 and 307 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), Pub. L. No. 107-155, amended section 441a to modify contribution limits. This section was further amended by section 319(b) of BCRA to cross-reference new section 441a-1 and new paragraph (i). These amendments apply with respect to contributions made on or after January 1, 2003.}

This next section applies to organisations like MoveOn.org which have ALSO put themselves at risk of being shut down for their OWN campaign violations, in addition to that of their primary benefactor George Soros:

(2) No multicandidate political committee shall make contributions—
(A) to any candidate and his authorized political committees with respect to any election for Federal office which, in the aggregate, exceed $5000;
(B) to the political committees established and maintained by a national political party, which are not the authorized political committees of any candidate, in any calendar year, which, in the aggregate, exceed $15000; or
(C) to any other political committee in any calendar year which, in the aggregate, exceed $5000.

Another section applicable to groups like MoveOn.org in this matter, as well as those established by Soros, especially with regard to donations like those from George Soros and others like him, is Section 441a Subsection (f) which reads as follows:

(f) Prohibited contributions and expenditures.
No candidate or political committee shall knowingly accept any contribution or make any expenditure in violation of the provisions of this section. No officer or employee of a political committee shall knowingly accept a contribution made for the benefit or use of a candidate, or knowingly make any expenditure on behalf of a candidate, in violation of any limitation imposed on contributions and expenditures under this section.

If we take into account the assault upon Steve Steiner we may find that the next few provisos also apply to the hired thugs who attacked Steiner, the organisers, and possibly even Soros himself:

§ 594. Intimidation of voters
Whoever intimidates, threatens, coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, at any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing such candidate, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(This article certainly applies to a now-dismissed staffer of a California GOP congressional candidate in a recent article.)

§ 606. Intimidation to secure political contributions
Whoever, being one of the officers or employees of the United States mentioned in section 602 of this title, discharges, or promotes, or degrades, or in any manner changes the offi cial rank or compensation of any other offi cer or employee, or promises or threatens so to do, for giving or withholding or neglecting to make any contribution of money or other valuable thing for any political purpose, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. § 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies and committees
Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication infl uences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House, or any joint committee of the Congress—
Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331 [of 18 U.S.C.]), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

So evidently we have some serious cases of election fraud we could slam Soros and even associations affiliated with him, from MoveOn.org to the Open Society Institute. We have so far 11 ways to break Soros and his evil neocommunist empire. But that's not all of it: The Racketeer and Influenced Corrupt Organisations Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 1952 (relating to racketeering) would also apply to both Soros and to groups like MoveOn.org, as would Section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments).
If we had a United States Attorney or an Attorney General willing to prosecute this matter we could easily send Mr Soros to prison for an extended term...and/or even deport him back to his native Hungary. We could also seize his wealth and use that to finance the Justice Department or at least the United States Attorneys offices. And to be able to use $7bn to the REAL advantage of the people would be a credit (1) and a benefit (2) to the United States...but only if we put the heat on our government. This is where YOU have to pick up the ball. This is where YOU write, call, EMAIL, your Congressman, your Senator, your Representative, the Department of Justice, the United States Attorney's Office, and you DEMAND a full investigation into George Soros, if not also the organisations that he financed.
And then we would see some REAL cleanup of the political financing scene. THAT is what American politics needs...not a flawed Voter Disenfranchisement Act that muzzles the common man and the common woman for 30 to 60 days before a primary or an election yet gives the controlled media a free pass to continue as they see fit promoting their choices with biased coverage.
And then we truly would have government BY the people FOR the people OF the people NOT the media!

So is George Soros REALLY the man who bought the world? Not necessarily but he is certainly trying hard to buy Congress and the American government. And here is where AMERICANS must come in.
Yes, that's right. If you are an American that includes YOU!
Start by spreading the word about the criminal threat people like George Soros pose to our freedom, our liberty, our republic, our democracy, our way of life. Tell your friends, your neighbours, your partners, your lovers, your family, your fellow employees the whole truth about Soros' evil gameplan. Get involved with groups like StopMoveOn.org---NOW!

YOUR FREEDOM DEPENDS HEAVILY UPON IT. Get your friends involved...it is the ONLY way we will defeat the menace of George Soros. =========== UNDERSTANDING THE COLLAPSE OF AIR AMERICA RADIO You may have heard recently about the collapse of the left-of-centre Air America Radio network. What more can we say about purposefully biased talk radio based upon irrational partisan hatred (1) that basically aped the same content already readily available in most broadcast and print outlets(2)? The same ideological bias heavily ingrained in Air America Radio was already heavily ingrained in the people occupying most editorial desks in the controlled media. Already that viewpoint was heavily represented via ABC News, CBS News, NBC News, National Public Radio, CNBC, MSNBC (originally a joint venture between NBC and Microsoft), and even Cable News Network (whose founder Ted Turner has donated BILLIONS to the United Nations and espoused rather left-of-centre views), to speak nothing of the print media, like the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Atlanta Journal and Constitution, San Francisco Chronicle, St Louis Post Dispatch, Kansas City Star, Miami Herald, Time Magazine, Newsweek, US News & World Report, Ms Magazine, The New Republic, Mother Jones Magazine, and Rolling Stone Magazine. And if you read or even work for any of those outlets aforementioned this is not a slight against you. You are NOT the problem even if you choose these media outlets. I understand why and I get it. My problem is less with the reporters so much as the reportage and the editors... So after the Fairness Doctrine was repealed in 1987---it had been in place for a few decades beforehand, when it was imposed to ostensibly seek "balance" and "equal time", when all it did was hamstring broadcast outlets so that real talk radio was crippled---real talk radio began to grow. I am sure you know the major names, I don't have to repeat them to you. There was a push to reimpose the "Fairness Doctrine" in 1994 in response to the surging success of Rush Limbaugh. That was stopped with public outcry and the 1994 election. Of course those in the controlled media and certainly in Air America certainly for the most part failed to understand that when idea-based media were put into the public marketplace it became evidently clear that the independent sources, like those on the internet (Drudge Report, WorldNetDaily, Newsmax) and again on talk radio, along with the now-10-year-old Fox News Channel, just to name a few examples, along with newspapers like the New York Post, New York Daily News, Los Angeles Daily News, Washington Times, and The Daily Oklahoman, were prospering and prospering quite heavily because the people were choosing those sources in increasing numbers. The reason for that is the independents tell the truth that is often obscured in the controlled media whether by omission, denial, or revisionism. THAT is what the people were demanding. And THAT helps explain the strong success of Fox News which have for the past several years crushed both CNN and MSNBC, along with the success of real talk radio: The independents make every effort to present BOTH SIDES of the issue, not merely a onesided version of events. Air America may well have gambled too much on their anti-Bush, anti-American agenda, and the gamble has caused them to roll "snake eyes". They hardly made much of an impact, performing well only in San Diego, Tampa, Miami, Portland, Seattle, and Cleveland. Their New York (#1 radio market) flagship WLIB-AM ranked even LOWER in Radio & Records books than they did in their previous incarnation as a Caribbean music-format station, PLUS that flagship practically bailed on them. Add to that their poor performance in the Los Angeles market (#2), where their affiliate KTLK-AM ranked at barely a sixth of the rating that KFI-AM---a major talk radio giant carrying Rush Limbaugh; KTLK-AM also trailed badly behind KABC-AM (Sean Hannity) and even trailed KRLA-AM (Michael Savage)---and their consistently poor performances across the country, rarely getting much more than a 1 share---and you can see clearly where the low demand for their ideology on the radio really came into play against Air America. Air America may still be able to survive but they may have to go to internet and satellite radio outlets. They of course may still get burned as long as they keep up their irrational partisan hatred which most Americans, Left Centre and Right alike, have tired of. ============ ARE MYSPACE CENSORING CERTAIN USERS WITH FRAUDULENT AND ARBITRARY DECLARATIONS OF "VIOLATIONS"? The administrators at MySpace.com dumped my account in violation of the law AND my First Amendment freedom of speech rights yesterday afternoon and now they won't allow me to create a new account! I was innocently using the services of the site, innocently networking and making new friends, when suddenly I found myself facing the following message: Invalid ID, The member has closed their account, or the profile has been deleted, and then I discovered an email from MySpace telling me that my account had been deleted for a "violation of Terms of Service". I'M GOING TO DISPROVE THEIR LAUNDRY LIST OF FALSEHOODS RIGHT NOW: "Your MySpace account has been deleted for violating our Terms of Service. " So-called "violations" which they did not specify, but just gave their usual laundry list of false reasons. "This is usually due to one of the following: * Nude images, sexually suggestive or violent photos" Of which I had NONE OF. "* Covering our banner ads with HTML" I wouldn't know how to do that so that's out of the question "* Harassing other users" Impossible. I may have rebutted a liberal here and there but in the end it's my GOD-GIVEN right backed by the United States Constitution to rebut any lies uttered by the Left. "* You do not meet the minimum age requirement " I'm 35 so that obliterates that reason. "* Spamming the classifieds, forums, bulletins, or other sections of the site " I NEVER did any of that; I simply USED the FEATURES of the site in protected free speech. "* Attempting to artificially inflate scores" I don't know how to do that! "* Scripting the site" I don't know how to do that either! "Your account cannot be restored. If you choose to return to MySpace, please follow the rules. " WHAT!? I PLAYED BY THEIR RULES AND THEY STILL DUMPED MY ACCOUNT, IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW! This is all the more reason News Corporation should terminate the administrator who illegally dumped my profile with almost 900 friends, for the SECOND TIME in one month, and all the more reason MySpace.com need to be prosecuted for fraud and for civil rights violations! And I have learnt in recent weeks that other conservatives have been targeted accordingly. You might not agree with my politics but you SHOULD understand the reality: We are not always going to agree, but it's far healthier to agree to differ than it is to go around being totally disagreeable. Would I go back to MySpace? Yes, if they took care of the technical glitch keeping me from opening a new account, which keeps sending me blog subscription entries from my newly-dumped account! But do I have contempt for their selective enforcement of their terms of service? ABSOLUTELY. I make every effort to play by the rules...and I still got burnt. Where is the sense in that? Maybe the Santa Monica Police Department or the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the California Attorney General's Office might have an answer. Maybe some of the local TV stations or newspapers or networks or media sites---controlled and independent alike---might pick up the ball. And this is by no means a problem with Tom Anderson per se: He takes a lot of grief for being a trailblazer. But others will improve upon that trail and pave it. Today's social networking two-lane road will become the divided highway of tomorrow, even with slip roads... =========== A FUNNY VIDEO...IF YOU CAN HANDLE THE...AHEM, YOU KNOW...EXCUSE ME... I thought I would take a moment to share this video with you. It originated on a Dutch television programme for children. I am presently in no mood for laughing but you might go ahead and laugh at this pig's silly joke on the farm girl... Well, folks, that is about all until I can build another blog entry from the TruthTap here on CherryTap. SEE YA!