Also, by the way, please read what the bouncers have to say about a very closely-related matter
here (will open in a new window if directly clicked).
(Not exactly a repost of my earlier one to follow. Slightly edited for clarity. Not enough so ...!)
--
What I think are reasonable claims for less and more stringent "interpretation" of NSFW rules in particular cases etc. -- (were I a bouncer which I am not. Etc. sigh. ...) could be made...
but I have seen an argument made in favor of dropping the whole kit and kaboodle, as I recall- that: "this is an adult site".
Erm.
It is true that one has to (claim to) be 18 or older to have an
account here, and therefore to see tagged images, blogs, etc. (Tagged blogs are visible to people not on one's list, I found, but not to people who've chosen in their profile preferences not to view NSFW material, and not to people who aren't logged in to their account!)
One does not have to be logged in to an account to simply type
in www.fubar.com and see any material in public areas of the site, and that's an argument for keeping that material restricted to unrestricted viewing- to what would be willing to see viewable by the public.
True "adult sites" under law at least require one to certify that one is 18 or older before one can pass a certain point at all. Yes, it's equally possible to lie in either case, yes, it's mostly a liability issue (no minor thing...)
So...
I'd say no.
Partially (an adult site...) But not really.
And if you mean in maturity ? -
thank you, I needed a laugh.
