Over 16,513,654 people are on fubar.
What are you waiting for?

signed the guestbook linked to in my stash with a suggestive image (one that does not bother me but very likely is against slide.com policy - and guess what - I do not wish to find out the wrong way...) - but it has been deleted. (I don't think that person is on my list, but it's just possible they might come by and see this blog, so it seemed worth posting it. May post the note elsewhere as well, though I thought it common sense once - don't put things in public areas unless you know that people will be able to just happen on them, all of them, if they curiously type in the address of the site, or follow a link from your AIM away message, or wander in on their parent at some unguarded moment, or... take your pick. Eh. Rant over, off to breakfast, may be back on later today but I really do have thisthat to do...

dis-MUMMenschantzed

Not the best title. My last attempt to post a MUMM was a few months back, and I learned the techniques of a small gang that seems to think that the MUMMs are their personal stronghold. With the possible exception of VICs, bouncers and admins, the only person who "owns" this site in a real sense is B.J., so I'm not quite sure why they think that Laws of MUMMing (I cannot be arsed to get the title that was used, it does not matter whether it was Rules or Laws-- I have only the greatest sneering contempt for such a concept if they truly believe in their right to set down such rules, and to enforce them by intimidation) are theirs to enforce, when they are not to be found even by extrapolation in the ToS, and then it is to be left to bouncers in any case. I didn't mind that the comments went off-topic, I thought it was a sign of much joy of attitude, but realize from consultation with those who know the people involved that it's more a sign of a favorite means of power play on their part- they'd tolerate no such thing, I gather, in MUMMs they post by anyone not in their circle. It could amuse, I suppose.

Rippers, too. Right...

The hysteria knows no bounds. Gen't Jack usually. If the image ripped is public domain, and if they'd click-saved and uploading a copy to their gallery it wouldn't have been clearly that of anyone on CT, why is it considered a cause for outrage if this is done without asking permission? In fact, great outrage? (Back-referencing http://www.cherrytap.com/blog/1886/314670< http://www.cherrytap.com/blog/1886/319944 http://www.cherrytap.com/blog/1886/326492 as public posts slightly to more relevant in background here.)
last post
16 years ago
posts
4
views
1,518
can view
everyone
can comment
everyone
atom/rss

other blogs by this author

blogroll (list of blogs that the blogger recommends)
13 years ago 
Just Me! by Jersey Girl  
6 years ago 
Leveling by 7166137  
4 years ago 
THE CATS MEOW by HELLCAT  
official fubar blogs
 8 years ago
fubar news by babyjesus  
 13 years ago
fubar.com ideas! by babyjesus  
 10 years ago
fubar'd Official Wishli... by SCRAPPER  
 10 years ago
Word of Esix by esixfiddy  

discover blogs on fubar

blog.php' rendered in 0.0941 seconds on machine '205'.