We need to take a long hard look at this man.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subject: What a Black Columnist has to say about Obama.
>
> Make sure you read the last two paragraphs. it could very
> well be !.
>
> Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun
>
> It's an amazing time to be alive in America . We're
> in a year of firsts in
> this presidential election: the first viable woman
> candidate; the first viable
> African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the
> first frontrunning
> freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will
> be a first.
>
> We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however,
> until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We
> won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk
>
> about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to
> the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking
> about his race, and start talking about his policies and
> his politics.
>
> The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a
> nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr.
> Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a
> closer and deeper look at him.
>
> Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy.
> He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And
> it's time people learned the facts.
>
> Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most
> liberal senator in the entire
> U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie
> Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a
> presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed
> from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our
> taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military
> weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal
> domestic agenda, and he lost.
>
> Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's
> not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt
> with him as if he were in a beauty pageant. Mr. Obama talks
> about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead
> the United States of America . But let's look at the
> more defined strokes of who he is underneath this
> superficial 'beauty.'
>
>
> Start with national security, since the president's
> most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the
> summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation
> armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions
> with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and
> create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering
> and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear
> option was off the table against terrorists - something no
> president has ever taken off the table since we created
> nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have
> worked in national security condemned all of those remarks.
> Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our
> national security at risk.
>
> Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our
> health care system is the
> strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created
> by Bill Clinton as
> well as President Bush, have made more goods more
> affordable so that even people of modest means can live a
> life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama
> promises to raise taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix
> Social Security? Raise
> taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription
> drugs? Raise taxes. Free
> college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His
> solution to everything is to have government take it over.
> Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.
>
> Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the
> audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise
> and glory to God!' but says that Christian leaders
> speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked' -
> hijacked - Christianity. He is
> pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme
> Court justices who
> will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He
> espouses the abortion views
> of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial
> cleansing. His
> spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is
> moving in that
> direction. In Illinois , he refused to vote against a
> statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These
> are radical left, Hollywood , and San Francis co values,
> not Middle America values.
>
> The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general
> election. Mrs. Clinton is a far
> tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people
> don't start looking behind
> his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of
> 'bringing America together' means saying that those
> who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or
> warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal
> agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs.
>
> But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a
> speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his
> race. Those should never be the factors on which we base
> our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda
> sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left
> of Mrs. Clinton.
>
> It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an
> election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the
> person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear
> age during a global civilizational war.
>
>
> ********** Kind of scary, wouldn't you think -
> Remember--God is good, and is in time, on time--every time.
>
>
> According to The Book of Revelations the anti-christ is:
>
> The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM
> descent, who will deceive the
> nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE
> Christ-like appeal....the
> prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will
> promise false hope and
> world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy
> everything. Is it OBAMA??
>
> I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to repost this as many
> times as you can! Each opportunity that you have to send it
> to a friend or media outlet...do it!
