While at work today, that all so often taboo found itself amongst the morning topic.
However, this below was the just of my argument within the facets of facts and how defective moral guidelines are in their terms to truth.
This is not verbatim, but close enough to what was said.
Even after I stated logical fact, the irony is that the end of my short piece was the inevitable outcome of the very topic this morning.
Why would one encompass an idea that moral value is what's same as truth?
Moral fundamental is not obtained in truth, be it that a moral holds no certainty in aspects to facts.
This not to initial that morals will not hap upon facts or is void in doing so; it is to confirm that they're not one in the same.
Simple instance: All moral code will differ in terms to cultural ideology, let alone, the gist of ideology will contradict itself, therefore, all moral agents in regards cannot be true (or of fact) when conflicting moral (value) code is met amid the contrary.
Truth is validated only in specifics, whereas, morals code falls under different specifics, building blocks upon cultural and traditions, and so on.
Faith belief systems bridge the gap between facts, or truth, thus, its arisen moral 'so called' credibility.
Whereas, we instinctively construct belief concepts within facts and then associate it even if its unknowns are validated in fact.