Lady Victoria Eclectic Pagan's blog: "Bulletin Saves and Shares"

created on 08/20/2007 | http://fubar.com/bulletin-saves-and-shares/b118141

posted on 01/25/2008&nbs-08:00;@&nbs-08:00;03:01&nbs-08:00;pm

Are you Aware or Oblivious?
http://fubar.com/are-you-aware-or-oblivious/b118141-688001

Are you Aware or Oblivious? * Are you aware by May of 2008 the law will require you to carry a national identification card? Are you aware that there are plans being developed to have all Americans embedded with a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) computer chip under their skin so they can be tracked wherever they go? The Department of Homeland Security's Emerging Applications and Technology Subcommittee said in a 15-page report that the use of RFID in identification cards or tokens could lead to illegal tracking of Americans... "Without formidable safeguards, the use of RFID in identification cards and tokens will tend to enable the tracking of individuals' movements, profiling of their activities and subsequent, non-security-related use of identification and derived information," the DHS draft report states. Not only do they imped on our privacy but they also pose a considerable Health Risk... Unlike the optical readers associated with bar codes, RFID readers emit electromagnetic energy over wide swaths. Proponents hope to embed RFID readers into walls, floors, doorways, shelving -- even in the refrigerators and medicine cabinets of our homes. We and our children would be continually bombarded with the energy emanating from these devices. Medical researchers have begun to raise questions about the long-term health effects of this type of chronic exposure to low levels of electromagnetic radiation. There is evidence they cause cancer in lab animals. Misuses of Rfid Technology: Government agencies and law enforcement officials could use the technology to violate the Fourth Amendment. The federal government has repeatedly expressed a desire to consolidate transaction information from commercial databases into a single, centralized database under its control. Once such transaction data includes unique EPC serial numbers linked to the identity of purchasers, RFID tags could be scanned at strategic locations and used to identify people that pass by as well as surreptitiously scan their belongings. A rogue federal agency could use RFID to create dossiers on citizens engaged in peaceful, First-Amendment-protected activities. Depending on one's politics, this might be a union meeting, a gun show, a peace march, or a talk by a prominent Muslim cleric. By walking through the crowd with an RFID reader device hidden in a briefcase, agents could capture information from RFID tags on objects carried by people attending the event. That data could be cross referenced with records in commercial databases to determine who was present. Members of the public have an absolute right to know when they are interacting with technology that could adversely affect their privacy and impact their health. Selling a pair of shoes that doubles as a tracking device without telling consumers about the RFID tag it contains is essentially a form of fraud. When a shopper buys a pair of shoes, she has a reasonable expectation that she is getting shoes, not something else. Not to mention: The chips they plain to place into human subjects can be turned off at their will. Eventually they would be used for everything... from paying bills to entry into public buildings etc. If the goverment wants to cut off your chip ,for whatever reason, they could. You would be basically helpless to buy food, pay your bills, access your bank accounts etc. That is the future if RFID technology is mainstreamed and it is all being justified by the Patriot Act. Big brother is secretly carving up your liberties! "The privacy impact of letting manufacturers and stores put RFID chips in the clothes, groceries, and everything else you buy is enormous." - California State Senator Debra Bowen * Are you aware the Supreme Court has ruled that the government has no authority to impose a direct unapportioned tax on the labor of the American people, and the 16th Amendment does not give the government that power? There is NO LAW requiring you to pay income taxes.. It was never ratified! The U.S. Supreme Court decided that the income tax was unconstitutional because it was not apportioned among the states in conformity with the Constitution. Article I, section 2, clause 3 and Article I, section 9, clause 4 of the Constitution state that all direct taxes are required to be apportioned among the states according to population. The constitution states that taxes can only be levied on businesses making a profit not from wages that are essential payment for a service, your time an labor equals a monetary payment. Taxes were never suppose to be applied to labor! Do you think the Irs and Federal reserve are goverment corporations? THEY ARE PRIVATE COMPANIES! Ron Paul On the federal reserve & speaking to congress... * Are you aware that computer voting machines can be rigged and there is no way to ensure that vote is counted? See Cliff Curtis's testimony : Our Primary Objectives should be to: * Stop the polarization of America * Stop the domination of the Democratic and Republican parties over our political system * Shut down the Federal Reserve system * Return America's gold to Fort Knox and have it audited * Have Congress and the IRS, in a public forum, reveal the law that requires Americans to pay a direct, unapportioned tax on their labor. * Make computerized voting illegal in all 50 states * Keep the internet free and out of the control of large institutions * Rescind the law called the Real ID Act so Americans never have to carry a National ID Card * Make it illegal to implant RFID chips in human beings * Educate juries to the fact that they have the right to determine the law as well as the facts of a case * Educate juries to the fact that they are not obligated to follow the instructions of a judge * Stop Globalization because it is the path to a one world government * Protect our borders * Restore the environment * Put an end to the Patriot Act The best Choice for The presidency in 2008 is without a doubt Ron Paul. Most of the issues I mentioned he plains to remedy. VOTE!: ^Click To Learn More^ (This Public Service Announcement is brought to you by MarQ V.2.0 Informing the Oblivious)